The Fall 2025 cohort · Fall 2025

Graduate seminar — cohort PLACEHOLDER, eleven capstones.

Below is the Fall 2025 roster of CSCI 655 · Generative AI for Software Development. The course was first offered in Spring 2025; this year is the second cohort. Each card opens that student's capstone page.

Cohort
15scholars
Second cohort
Capstones
11/ 11 shipped
Across nine domains
Domains
09fields
Across nine areas
Graduating
13/ 15
Saturday, May 16
Term closes
May 142026
Final evaluations sent
The roster

The fifteen, in order of enrollment.

Sorted by student number. Each card shows preferred name, group, capstone, and graduating status. Two scholars return for senior year — Jack and Krishna. The rest cross the stage on Saturday.

Graduating · May 16 Returning · Senior year
N° 01

Aidan Basloe Aidan

Group 01 Graduating

Stock Investment AIAn algorithmic stock-prediction interface with explainable retrieval-grounded recommendations. Final project · Finance & markets

WM·931112419 View
N° 02

Sam Bennett Sam

Group 05 Graduating

BURT++A bug-report assistant that translates non-technical user complaints into actionable engineering tickets. Final project · Dev tools · QA

WM·931088564 View
N° 03

Nathaniel Callabresi Nathaniel

Group 02 Graduating

Multimodal Video IndexingNatural-language search over video archives that replaces flawed metadata-only retrieval. Final project · Search · multimedia

WM·931082668 View
N° 04

Alan Gonzalez Osorio Alan

Group 03 Graduating

Sports Betting ArbitrageAimed to flag cross-sportsbook arbitrage in real time. Domain understanding was strong; the build did not reach a working prototype. Final project · Sports · risk

WM·931100528 View
N° 05

James He James

Group 04 Graduating

PlotForgeNatural-language plotting interface for non-analysts. The audience was clear; the differentiation against existing tools was not. Final project · Tooling · data

WM·931100578 View
N° 06

Walker Hyman Walker

Group 11 Graduating

AI-Powered Job SearchIdentified a real pain point in fragmented career tooling. Lacked the competitor analysis and sizing the brief required. Final project · Career · jobs

WM·931098146 View
N° 07

Alice Ji Alice

Group 06 Graduating

GenAI Claim VerificationRead as a paper on RAG-based fact-checking rather than a product. The technical core was real; the product framing never landed. Final project · Civic · verification

WM·931092207 View
N° 08

Jeff Lin Jeff

Group 01 Graduating

Stock Investment AIPaired with Aidan on the algorithmic stock-prediction capstone. Final project · Finance & markets

WM·931117636 View
N° 09

Abby Schwall Abby

Group 07 Graduating

W&M Degree MapA planning tool for liberal-arts students navigating complex general-education requirements. Final project · Education · planning

WM·931099473 View
N° 10

Jack Stawasz Jack

Group 04 Returning

PlotForgePaired with James on the plotting interface. Worked on the front-end iteration loop. Final project · Tooling · data

WM·931109548 View
N° 11

Krishna Swaminathan Krishna

Group 08 Returning

RAG Rules · Ultimate FrisbeeA retrieval-augmented rules interpreter for self-officiated Ultimate Frisbee matches. Final project · Sports · rules

WM·931124824 View
N° 12

Yibarek Tadesse Yibarek

Group 09 Graduating

CodeCasterCoding assistant aimed at social-science students. Scenario was vivid; market analysis and differentiation under-built. Final project · Education · code

WM·931085113 View
N° 13

Camly Tran Camly

Group 06 Graduating

GenAI Claim VerificationPaired with Alice on the retrieval pipeline; led the evidence-ranking experiments. Final project · Civic · verification

WM·931074682 View
N° 14

Lily Walker Lily

Group 02 Graduating

Multimodal Video IndexingPaired with Nathaniel on natural-language search over video archives. Final project · Search · multimedia

WM·931084537 View
N° 15

Carter Williamson Carter

Group 10 Graduating

Youth Sports RegistrationA multilingual youth-sports registration platform with strong accessibility focus. Final project · Civic · community

WM·931095104 View
The capstones

Research groups PLACEHOLDER, nine domains.

Each group chose a real problem, scoped a system, and built something that runs. Eleven projects, nine domains.